IS "DIARY OF ANNE FRANK" A FRAUD?
Lies being taught;
Anne Frank was victim of Holocaust who was a brave girl and kept a diary of her ordeal during Holocaust which narrates horrors of Holocaust.
Now the truth;
Textbook History has myths that live a longer and richer life than truth.
A noteworthy decision of the New York Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid to him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the "Anne Frank Diary."
Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.
Levin wrote the Anne Frank diary with an eye toward a Broadway production, but Otto decided to cut him out, refusing to honor his contract or pay him for his work. Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Court Jury awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his 'intellectual work'.
The Jury awarded $ 50,000 dollars as compensation to be paid by Otto Frank father of Anne Frank to Jew Writer Meyer Levin who wrote Diary of Anne Frank. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law as it was not based upon "legal" evidence of loss. The reason was that if Writer Meyer levin had written the said novel under his own name and sold it as it was a fiction, then it would not have sold so many copies. Because Otto Frank father of Anne frank gave his fictional book name of his dead daughter and projected to gullible public as “real” story of Anne Frank that so many copies were sold and windfall profits were made. However in further appeal against the order of Judge Coleman, by Jewish writer Meyer Levin matter was compromised out of court between the parties.
Jewish writer Meyer Levin had approached the Court for his claim for damages on account of writing the “Diary of Anne Frank”, He had also won his case from the Jury, He would not have withdrawn his Appeal had he not been paid out of court by Otto Frank, to avoid media publicity. So Otto Frank did pay Jewish writer Meyer Levin $ 50,000 dollars or thereabout for writing ‘Diary of Anne Frank’.
Complete details of the case are available in case titled Meyer Levin Vs Otto Frank, File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office.
In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.
The German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this report stating that;-
(a) some editing postdated 1951;
(b) Experts had held that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus –
(c) the entire diary was a postwar fake.
The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by László Bíró, in 1938. In 1940 the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina fleeing Nazi Germany and on June 10 filed for its patent. however it never came into production till about 29 October 1945 in America and was not readily available to all till 1951. Children were not even allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.
Millions of humans world wide were fed a fiction by Jew Otto Frank for the sake of money is nothing new. In any case it was not the fault of Anne Frank. She had not done anything wrong. She had not even written any diary.
Sources;-
Note by author;-
What everybody believes in, is that Jewish Writer Meyer Levin had impersonated Anne frank, the extent of impersonation is in doubt whether it was ‘X’ % or ‘Y’%. To my mind if impersonation is accepted then whether it is in part or in whole is immaterial. Even those who believe that Anne Frank wrote part of diary also believe that her father tore off part of her diary which was favorable to Nazi regime and unfavorable to her own family particularly unfavorable to her own father Otto Frank. So whether it is a case of half truth or full lies, the diary has to be denounced as fake.
Secondly If Meyer Levin had not written the first part someone who was “paid well” might have, receipt properly taken and no cause for a court case !!!
Thirdly where is the case for profits, such instances come dime a dozen in:-
a) All 70 + Countries attacked and enslaved for world domination British where every household suffered similar fate in the hands of their British masters.
b) Treatment of slaves in America or treatment of US native inhabitants by European immigrants or Jews who are ruling US today.
c) Treatment of slaves by Europeans. The bible mentions that the Jews went into slavery. Deuteronomy 28:68 and they had yokes of iron put around their necks. Deuteronomy 28:48
d) Every place which has suffered slavery has worst diaries, except that in those countries slaves do not own the media.
Lastly in some countries denial of holocaust / or Anne frank diary is illegal. In some cities particularly in Amsterdam such diaries have been used to generate massive tourism and made a source of revenue. Such cities / countries or their “courts of law” will jealously defend the diary and will prosecute to the extent of bankruptcy anyone and everyone who publicly denies the diary as a fraud. However such prosecution has nothing to do with upholding the truth but more to protect the revenue illegally earned over last fifty five years. A case in hand is that of David Irwing. Another is Julian Assange, who has been persecuted for publishing truth in Wikileaks. Nobody has challenged the truth in Wikileaks yet Julian Assange has been persecuted to the extent of bankruptcy.
Freedom can mean freedom of expression or freedom to sway the masses by the money power of political donations, or having your own chosen one as a puppet President 'who' then decides on judges most of whom dance to moneyers behind their appointments.
