Lyrics Kade Os Pair Thalle: Thokra

Kade os pair thalle kade oss pair thalle../
kaanu thokra tu maare, agge bade dukh jhalle../y d u blow me, i have already taken many sorrows
marr mukkeya toh jeen de sawaal poochdi e../u ask the questions of life from an almost dead person
ni tu jaan jaan ke../u do it knowingly

patjhada wich patteya daa haal pooch di e../u ask leaves their condition in period of decline
ni tu jaan jaane ke ni tu jaan ke.../hey u do it knowingly....u do it knowingly

nee tu jaan di e saari jedi saade naal beeti../u know all what has occured to me
ikk maareya ni jaano baaki ghatt v nhi kitti../u dint kill bt did not do less than that
vichon kush e tu utton dukha naal puchchdi e../u happy from inside n ask with a sad face, from outside
ni tu jaan jaan ke ni tu jaan jaan ke../hey u do it knowingly....u do it knowingly

Jana kana raj kaakde nu maarda e taana../every tom dick n harry scolds Raj Kaakda [Name of the lyricist]
jitho laab da c heere o c kole diyan khaana../all were coal's mine from where I was fidning diamonds
ni tu karke sikandar, kangaal puchch di e../u ask after making rich a poor
ni tu jaan jaan ke..jaan ke.../hey u do it knowingly....u do it knowingly
patjhadan vich patteya da haal puchchdi e.../u ask leaves their condition in period of decline

ni tu jaan jaan ke...ni tu jaan jaan ke..jaan jaan ke
[/hey u do it knowingly....u do it knowingly]

Lyrics Jadon Kadi Tenu Mera

Pardesi naal naa nue laaiye......never luv a stranger
bhaave laakh sone da hove.....even if he is worth a million Gold
par ikk galle pardesi changa....but stranger is gud for one thing
jadon yaad kare tan rove....that he cries when remember u

Jadon kadi tenu mera pyar satavega.....whenever my luv will trouble u
Rabb di soun fer tenu chain naa aaevga.....God promise u will not find peace
Jadon kadi tainu mera pyar satavega......whenever my luv will trouble u

Rovengi tu nukkra ch mu de de ke....u will cry with ur face in corners
saad dega tenu e judai wala sake e.....this shall burn u, this is heat of seperation
mera e vichchora tenu bada tadpawega....my this seperation will trouble u a lot
Rabb di soun fer tenu chain naa aaevga......God promise u will not find peace
Jado nakdi tainu mera pyar....whenever my luv will trouble u


Din raati rovengi, vichchoda tenu pai gaya.....u will cry day n night that u have seperated from me
Turr jaan vaala mere sukh naal lai gaya.....n i have taken away ur happiness from u
rondi vekh tenu koi chupp naa karavega......nobdy will console u while u will be crying
rondi vekh tenu koi chupp naa karavega......nobdy will console u while u will be crying
Rabb di soun fer tenu chain naa aavega......God promise u will not find peace
Jadon kadi tainu mera pyar satavega......whenever my luv will trouble u

Honvegi shudain ate rehne tenu hosh nai....u will go crazy n u will not remain in ur senses
aakhdi firengi tu te ohda koi dosh nai...n will keep shouting, he has not fault
ohda koi dosh nai.....he has no fault
raava wich rulldee nu koi naa uthavega....nobody will pick u up wandering in streets
Rabb di soun fer tenu chain naa aavega......God promise u will not find peace
Jadon kadi tainu mera pyar satavega......whenever my luv will trouble u

Who wrote Diary of Anne Frank?

IS "DIARY OF ANNE FRANK" A FRAUD? 

Lies being taught;

Anne Frank was victim of Holocaust who was a brave girl and kept a diary of her ordeal during Holocaust which narrates horrors of Holocaust.

Now the truth;

Textbook History has myths that live a longer and richer life than truth.

A noteworthy decision of the New York Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid to him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the "Anne Frank Diary."

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin  in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.

Levin wrote the Anne Frank diary with an eye toward a Broadway production, but Otto decided to cut him out, refusing to honor his contract or pay him for his work. Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Court Jury awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his 'intellectual work'.

The Jury awarded $ 50,000 dollars as compensation to be paid by Otto Frank father of Anne Frank to Jew Writer Meyer Levin who wrote Diary of Anne Frank. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law as it was not based upon "legal" evidence of loss. The reason was that if Writer Meyer levin had written the said novel under his own name and sold it as it was a fiction, then it would not have sold so many copies. Because Otto Frank father of Anne frank gave his fictional book name of his dead daughter and projected to gullible public as “real” story of Anne Frank that so many copies were sold and windfall profits were made. However in further appeal against the order of Judge Coleman, by Jewish writer Meyer Levin matter was compromised out of court between the parties. 

Jewish writer Meyer Levin had approached the Court for his claim for damages on account of writing the “Diary of Anne Frank”, He had also won his case from the Jury, He would not have withdrawn his Appeal had he not been paid out of court by Otto Frank, to avoid media publicity. So Otto Frank did pay Jewish writer Meyer Levin $ 50,000 dollars or thereabout for writing ‘Diary of Anne Frank’.

Complete details of the case are available in case titled Meyer Levin Vs Otto Frank, File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office.

In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.

The German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this report stating that;-

(a) some editing postdated 1951;

(b) Experts had held that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus –

(c) the entire diary was a postwar fake.

The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by László Bíró, in 1938. In 1940 the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina fleeing Nazi Germany and on June 10 filed for its patent. however it never came into production till about 29 October 1945 in America and was not readily available to all till 1951. Children were not even allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.

Millions of humans world wide were fed a fiction by Jew Otto Frank for the sake of money is nothing new. In any case it was not the fault of Anne Frank. She had not done anything wrong. She had not even written any diary.

Sources;-

http://www.rense.com/general65/aan.htm

http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=614599

http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/frank.html

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p147_Faurisson.html

http://www.campbellmgold.com/archive_general/anne_frank_diary_fraud.pdf

Note by author;-

What everybody believes in, is that Jewish Writer Meyer Levin had impersonated Anne frank, the extent of impersonation is in doubt whether it was ‘X’ % or ‘Y’%. To my mind if impersonation is accepted then whether it is in part or in whole is immaterial. Even those who believe that Anne Frank wrote part of diary also believe that her father tore off part of her diary which was favorable to Nazi regime and unfavorable to her own family particularly  unfavorable to her own father Otto Frank. So whether it is a case of half truth or full lies, the diary has to be denounced as fake.

Secondly If Meyer Levin had not written the first part someone who was “paid well” might have, receipt properly taken and no cause for a court case !!!

Thirdly where is the case for profits, such instances come dime a dozen in:-

a)     All 70 + Countries attacked and enslaved for world domination British  where every household suffered similar fate in the hands of their British masters.

b)     Treatment of slaves in America or treatment of US native inhabitants by European immigrants or Jews who are ruling US today.

c)     Treatment of slaves by Europeans. The bible mentions that the Jews went into slavery. Deuteronomy 28:68 and they had yokes of iron put around their necks. Deuteronomy 28:48

d)     Every place which has suffered slavery has worst diaries, except that in those countries slaves do not own the media.

Lastly in some countries denial of holocaust / or Anne frank diary is illegal. In some cities particularly in Amsterdam such diaries have been used to generate massive tourism and made a source of revenue. Such cities / countries or their “courts of law” will jealously defend the diary and will prosecute to the extent of bankruptcy anyone and everyone who publicly denies the diary as a fraud. However such prosecution has nothing to do with upholding the truth but more to protect the revenue illegally earned over last fifty five years. A case in hand is that of David Irwing. Another is Julian Assange, who has been persecuted for publishing truth in Wikileaks. Nobody has challenged the truth in Wikileaks yet Julian Assange has been persecuted to the extent of bankruptcy.  

Freedom can mean freedom of expression or freedom to sway the masses by the money power of political donations, or having your own chosen one as a puppet President 'who' then decides on judges most of whom dance to moneyers behind their appointments.

LOVE AND MARRIAGE

LOVE AND MARRIAGE;

A student asked a teacher, “What is Love?” The teacher said, “In order to answer your question, go to the corn field, choose the biggest corn and come back. But the rule is: You can go through them only once and not turn back to pick. Once you miss it, you cannot go back to it.”

The student headed for the field, and went through the first row. He saw one big corn, but he wondered may be there is a bigger one later. Then he saw another bigger one but wondered if there may be an even bigger one waiting for him.

Afterward, when he had completed more than half of the corn field, he started to realize that the corn growing around the area were not as big as the previous one he saw. He knew he missed the biggest one, and he regretted it. So, he went back to his teacher empty handed.

The teacher told him, “This is Love you keep looking for a better one, but you only realize it when you have already missed the person.”

“What is Marriage then?” the student asked.

The teacher said, “In order to answer your question, go back to the corn field and choose the biggest corn and come back. But the rule is: you can go through them only once and cannot turn back to pick.”

The student went back to the corn field, and this time he was careful not to repeat the previous mistake. When he reached the middle of the field, he picked a corn that he felt satisfied with, and came back to the teacher.

The teacher told him, “When picking the corn this time you looked for one that is just nice, that you had faith in and are satisfied with. This is Marriage. Life is not about searching for the happiness but to feel contentment in the things you have.”

Was Mahatma Gandhi responsible for partition of India?

Immediately after and till 1919, Communal tension between Hindus and Muslims was at the lowest. The mutual relationship was at its best. It was all going on the right track with the Gadar movement & the influence of Bal Gangadhar Tilak. The ideology of the Gadar party was strongly secular. In the words of Sohan Singh Bhakna, who later became a major peasant leader of Punjab: "Our religion was patriotism". Had this atmosphere prevailed India we would never have never been partitioned on the basis of religion.

But everything changed with the Khilafat. A movement that would never gathered momentum unless supported by Gandhiji.

What is Khilafat movement?

The Ottoman empire, having sided with the Central Powers during World War I, suffered a major military defeat. The Treaty of Versailles (1919) reduced its territorial extent and diminished its political influence but the victorious European powers promised to protect the Ottoman emperor's status as the Caliph. However, under the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), territories such as Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt severed from the empire.

In September 1919, Maulana Muhammad Ali and his brother Shaukat Ali, together with Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, Dr. Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari, and Hasrat Mohani, started a new organization, the Khilafat Movement. The Khilafat movement (1919-1924) was a political campaign launched mainly by Muslims in British India to influence the British government in favor of Ottoman Empire and to protect the Ottoman Empire during the aftermath of World War I. Their avowed aim was to use whatever leverage they had with the British, as residents of a British colony, to protect the Caliphate. They organized Khilafat Conferences in several northern Indian cities. In 1920 they published the Khilafat Manifesto.

The Ali brothers then made a strategic alliance. They convinced Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to join a Hindu-Muslim alliance for self-rule (Indian Independence, or Swaraj {Self Rule}). Gandhi's followers would support the Khilafat Movement if the Muslims would support Gandhi's efforts for Swaraj {Self Rule}. Gandhi became a member of the Central Khilafat Committee and at the Nagpur session (1920) of the Indian National Congress Gandhi proposed a non-cooperation campaign, of non-violent satyagraha, in support of Swaraj {Self Rule} and Khilafat. Gandhiji, the apostle of Hindu-Muslim unity claimed: "We talk of Hindu- Mohammedans unity. It would be an empty phrase if the Hindus hold aloof from the Mohammedans when their vital interests are at stake." This ‘vital interest’ was the restoration of the Khilafat in far away Turkey at the cost of national freedom! and asked Hindus to support rule of Khilafat. The Khilafat-Non-Cooperation movement is singular because it is the only movement led by Gandhi that was centered on a religious issue: the preservation of the Sultan of Turkey as the Caliph of all Muslims.

KHILAFAT & HINDU-MUSLIM DISUNITY?

If a hundred million Muslims are more vitally interested in the fate of far away Muslim Country-Turkey than they are IN the fate of India, they can hardly be regarded as a unit of Indian nation. By his own admission that the Khilafat question was a vital one for the Indian Muslims, Gandhi himself in a way admitted that they formed a separate nation; they were in India, but not of India. "

The Khilafat movement became a disaster in more ways than one. Indian history books written under congress influence carefully leave out the Khilafat fiasco, or if they mention it all they present it as a unifier of Hindus and Muslims. The reality is quite different. The Hindu-Muslim alliance soon dissolved in communal violence. It resulted in a massacre of tens of thousands of innocent Hindus all over India. It was particularly virulent in Kerala where a Jihad (Holy War against infidels) called the Mopla Rebellion erupted. In August 1921, the poor Muslim peasants of Malabar (now part of Kerala state) erupted in the Moplah rebellion. After a pitched battle with British troops, the peasants attacked their predominantly Hindu, upper-caste landlords. In 1920, some 18,000 Muslim peasants, mostly from Sind and the North Western Provinces, voluntarily emigrated to Afghanistan. They believed that India was Dar al-Harb, a non-Islamic land, and wished to live in Dar al-Islam, an Islamic polity.

To make matters worse for Gandhi, Muslim leaders like the Ali brothers, whom he had sponsored and supported during the Khilafat, publicly humiliated him;

Mohammed Ali even said that a Muslim thief was better than Gandhi, simply because of the thief’s faith in Islam! "

Gandhiji's support to Khilafat led to following factors:

1) Indian Muslims realized that it is right to have pan-Islamic agenda. It is right to fight for Turkey's caliph when their own country is under foreign rule.

2) The movement itself was for a wrong cause when the majority in Turkey themselves wanted democracy.

3) With Turkey's adopting democracy under Kamal Ataturk, Khilafat became a laughing stock, making the Indian leadership also laughing stock.

4) The end of Khilafat saw Moplah riots, the bloodiest in India's history when Hindus were made to pay the price because the Turks refused caliph's rule.

5) Gandhji praised the moplahs saying that they are "god-fearing" (when the whole country including Ambedkar & Annie Besant was shocked at the cruelty). This gave Muslim community a belief they can never be wrong.

6) FINALLY, KHILAFAT LAID THE FOUNDATION OF PARTITION. BECAUSE IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE AGENDA OF HINDU & MUSLIM COMMUNITY WERE DIFFERENT.

THAT IS HOW INDIA WAS PARTITIONED.

IN REAL WORLD; IS IT GOOD TO DO GOOD?

IN REAL WORLD; IS IT GOOD TO DO GOOD?

The Snake, The Farmer, And the Heron

A snake chased by hunters asked a farmer to save its life. To hide it from it's pursuers, the farmer squatted and let the snake crawl into his belly. but when the danger had passed and the farmer asked the snake to come out, the snake refused. It was warm and safe inside. On his way home, the man saw a heron and went up to him and whispered what had happened. The heron told him to squat and strain to eject the snake. When the snake snuck its head out, the heron caught it, pulled it out and killed it. The farmer was worried that the snakes poison might still be inside him, and the the heron told him that the cure for snake poison was to cook and eat six white fowl. "You're a white fowl," said the farmer. "You'll do for a start." He grabbed the heron, put it in a bag and carried it home, where he hung it up while he told his wife what had happened. "I'm surprised at you," said the wife. "The bird does you a kindness, rids you of the evil in your belly, saves your life in fact, yet you catch it and talk of killing it." She immediately released the heron, and it flew away. But on its way, it gouged out her eye.

Moral: When you see water flowing uphill, it means that someone is repaying a kindness.

Ayodhya belongs to Lord Ram/Hindus

Ayodhya is to Hindus what Mecca & Medina is to Islam. Lord Ram was born on January 10, 5114 BC.

http://lakdiva.org/aryan/rama.html

Ramayana was written in 400 BC which described Ayodhya as birthplace of Lord Ram ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valmiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramayana

Prophet Mohamed was born some time 570/571 AD i.e almost 5600 years after birth of Lord Ram and 1000 years after Ramayana was written which described Ayodhya as birth place of Ram.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad

Its a case of simple arithmetic yet for the purpose of Muslims votes disputes lingers on.

Will Muslims allow a church to be built at Mecca and Medina ?

If not then Ayodhya belongs to Hindus the same way Mecca belongs to Muslims.

The Other Turkish name of Babri Mosque is "Masjid E Janmasthan" means "Mosque in the Birthplace" . That clearly indicates that the Mosque was built on the birthplace of Lord Ram.

The Judgement  on lord Ram birthplace was given after an issue was framed as to whether

a)   Disputed site was in fact the  Birth Place of Lord Ram

b)   The structure built by Mir baki was after demolition of an existing Hindu Temple at disputed site.

Archaeological excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 1970, 1992 and 2003 in and around the disputed site clearly found the evidence indicating that a large Hindu complex existed on the site. In 2003, by the order of an Indian Court, The Archaeological Survey of India was asked to conduct a more in depth study and an excavation to ascertain the type of structure that was beneath the rubble. The summary of the ASI report indicated definite proof of a huge Temple under the mosque. In the words of ASI researchers, they discovered "distinctive features associated with... temples of north India". The excavations yielded: 

"stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of a divine couple and carved architectural features, including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broke octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure..”

The Indian High Court while giving its Judgment relied upon the report of Archaeological survey of India to decide the above issues in favor of Hindus. i.e. Mosque was built after demolition of Hindu Temple. 

The Judgment though  only gives 2/3 satisfaction to Hindus who hope that remaining 1/3^rd satisfaction shall be given either by Muslims or by Supreme court of India.

Ayodhya prompts several thoughts relating to the Temple Mount. It shows that the Temple Mount dispute is far from unique. Muslims have habitually asserted the supremacy of Islam through architecture, building on top of the monuments of other faiths (as in Jerusalem and Ayodhya) or appropriating them (e.g. the Ka'ba in Mecca and the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople or ground Zero in New York).

I wish my all those Muslim brothers for their prosperity and happiness for accepting Sri Ram Mandir and showing tolerance in the world's largest democratic country.  Because I believe that even BIG BROTHERS also have some demands which needs to be fulfilled and cannot be expected to sacrifice EVERYTIME. Secularism doesn't mean SACRIFICE done by MAJORITY only.

Unification of all religions

How can unification of all religions i.e. Judaism, Christianity and Islam in one God be achieved. The answer is simple because all the three religions claims to believe in same god, The God of Ab Ram. They merely squabble over whose words are the truest representation of God.

Ab Ram’s (Abraham / Ibrahim) wife Sarah Couldn’t have children, so he took on a second wife, his Arab maid Servant Hagar, who gave him a son who is called Ishmael. Thirteen years later, Sarah manages to have a Son, Isaac. Abraham dies. Sarah banishes Hagar and Ishmael and Semitic race is split between Arab and Jew.

The Jewish faith got its beliefs from its prophet Moses whose lineage the Jews trace back to Isaac and Abram. A few hundred years later, Jesus – a Jewish prophet – comes up with his version of Abram’s beliefs. Jewish leaders considered Christ a rebel. Jesus Christ was declared as a ‘Son of God’ three hundred years later by Emperor Constantine of Rome after ‘Council of Nicae’ in 325 AD. Interestingly the word Jesus and Jewish have similar pronunciation.

A few hundred years later, yet another man, Mohamed, shows up claiming that he is in fact a God’s true messenger, not the first two ‘Charlatans’ and he promises to teach the true revelations of Abram – as traced through Ishmael and this time Islam is born. Christens leaders at the time considered Islam a Christian heresy. After death of Mohamed Islam is divided in two sects Shiites and Sunnis both claiming to be the rightful successor of Mohamed. Hajj is to commemorate the God’s sparing of Ishmael, son of Abram.

Arabs, Jews, Christians kill each other even throw missiles at each other over the mostly hotly contested piece of real estate on earth, all because it is supposedly the site of Abram’s grave, a small cave that has separate viewing areas for “different” religions of grave of Abram in Hebron.

Following is the genealogy of King Solomon and Jesus Christ as given in Gospel of Matthew :-

Abram was the father of Isaac and Ishmael, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers 1st being Levi, and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Ram, and Ram the father of Amminadab, and Aminadab the father of Nahson, and Nahson the father of Salmon, and Salmon the father of B’oaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse he father of David the first King of Jews (Israel). And David was the father of King Solomon by the wife of Uriah, and Solomon the father of Rehoboam, and Rehoboam the father of Abijah and Abijah the father of Asa, and Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, and Joram the father of Uzziah, and Uzziah the father of Jotham, and Jotham the father of Ahaz, and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos and Amos the father of Josiah, and Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon. And after the deportation to Babylon; Jechoniah was the father of Shealtiel and Shealtiel the father of Zebrubbabel, and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor, and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud, and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.

Following is the genealogy of Moses from Ab Ram as per http://www.mazzaroth.com/

Abraham father of Issac father of Jacob father of levi (1 of 12)father of Kohath father of Amran who is father of Moses.

http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterFive/MosesGenealogyCancerToAries.htm

Following is genealogy of Prophet Mohammed from Ab ram as per Islamicoccasions.com

Abraham / Ibrahim Ishmael / Ismail  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Brothers Isaac / Ishaq

Sabat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jacob / Israil / Yaqub

Yashab >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Lavi

Ba'rab >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Qamat

Nakor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Imran

Adnan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Moses / Musa

Madh

Nazar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Imran

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Is not in lineage of Moses/Musa

Nasar>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Mary/Maryam

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Virgin mother of Jesus Christ

Elias / Iliyas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;Jesus Christ / Isa

… Kanana >>>> Nafar >>>>> Maleeh

Fahar >>>>>>>>Ghalib >>>>; Looi (Levi)

Kaab >>>>>>>> Murra>>>>> Kalab

Qosai >>>>>>>> Abde Munaf >>

Hashim>>>>>>>  Abdul Muttalib >> Abdullah

Muhammad(S.A.W.)

The Last Apostle of God

http://www.ezsoftech.com/akram/prophetslineage.asp

But where is RAM of Hinduism in “Ab ‘Ram’”, Check genealogy of Moses.

http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterFive/MosesGenealogyCancerToAries.htm (Period of Ram-before BC 2370 - Age of Aries)

Ram of Hindus was born on January 10, 5114 BC.

http://lovkap.blogspot.com/2010/10/ayodhya-belongs-to-lord-ramhindus.html

“As scarce as Knowledge is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.”

World War 1

Lies being taught;

Germany was responsible for World War 1.

Germany was defeated in World War 1.

Now the truth;

I had already stated that during 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, the activities of Masons in countries such as France, Germany, Italy and Russia, clearly showed that the goal of Masonry was socio-political revolution. Masonry wanted to establish a new order in which religious institutions and religious faith are eradicated, and to this end has attempted to topple monarchies that were supportive of religion. In many European countries, Masonic lodges became rallying centers for opponents of religion, where coups, uprisings, assassinations, political plots and anti-religious politics were conspired. Behind all such activities, whether on a small or grand scale, which have occurred since the French Revolution in 1789 to the twentieth century, is found the influence of Masonry.

The most interesting aspect of this silent and remote strategy is that those Masons who are carrying it out almost never reveal that it is being done in the name of Masonry. They do their work under different identities, titles and in different positions of power, but they impose a commonly espoused philosophy they adopted through Masonry, on society. According to the English historian Michael Howard, Masonic lodges concentrated their efforts in the second half of the nineteenth spread over to twentieth century to overthrow the two remaining important Empires: the Austro-Hungarian and the Russian Empires, and were able to achieve their goal as a result of the World War One. 

Dr Custos a German National in his book ‘The Freemasons, the world vampire’ wrote that French and English freemasons paid 5 million pound to the Serbs to murder Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in Sarajevo. The murder took place on 28th June 1914. A detailed research of this theory reveals as under:-

Murder was committed by a secret society “Black Hand”. The relation of term ‘Black’ & ‘Hand’ with Masonry cannot be merely coincidental like many others facts. The murder was planned for 28th June when as many as seven teams of assassins were prepared by ‘Black Hand’ so that murder must take place on 28th June. The first six failed. Seventh was successful. It is commonly known that 24th June is Masonic brotherhood day. However only an informed mason knows that for calculating actual date the number 4 is added because of the Y L. Hence it is correct that murder if planned for 28th June had special significance for Masons. World War one ended when treaty of Versailles was signed on 28th June, 1919 -Masonic day. The pay-up can never be always evidenced even with today’s technology.

It was Serb freemasons in the Black Hand, the precursor of the Mafia, who launched World War I in 1914 when they convinced Gavrillo Princip to assassinate the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in the streets of Sarajevo. Archduke Ferdinand's crime? From the mason's perspective, he was a Roman Catholic and heir to the Austrian throne.

During the trial of Archduke Ferdinand's killer, Gavrillo Princep testified that his colleague, Ciganovich, "told me he was a freemason" and "on another occasion told me that the Heir apparent had been condemned to death by a freemason's lodge."  Moreover, another of the accused assassins, Chabrinovitch, testified that Major Tankositch, one of the plotters, was a freemason.

28th July 1914 - The Austrian government blamed the Serbian government for the assassination of Franz Ferdinand and his wife and declared war on Serbia. Although Russia was allied with Serbia, Germany did not believe that she would mobilise and offered to support to Austria if necessary. However, Russia did mobilise and, through their alliance with France, called on the French to mobilise.

1st August 1914 - Germany declared war on Russia.

3rd August 1914 - Germany declared war on France. German troops poured into Belgium as directed under the Schleiffen Plan, drawn up in 1905. The British foreign secretary, Sir Edward Grey, sent an ultimatum to Germany demanding their withdrawal from the neutral Belgium.

4th August 1914 - Germany did not withdraw from Belgium and on 4th August 1914 Britain declared war on Germany.

With Britain's entry into the war, her colonies and dominions abroad variously offered military and financial assistance, and included Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand and South Africa.

23rd August 1914 - Japan declared war on Germany through her alliance with Great Britain, signed in 1902.

25th August 1914 - Austria-Hungary responded by declaring war on Japan.

29th October 1914 – Turkey extended help to German naval bombardment of Russia.

2nd November 1914 – Because of Turkeys help to Germany, Russia declared War on Turkey.

5th November 1914 - Britain and France, Russia's allies, declared war on Turkey, because of the help given to the German attack on Russia. The following is the list of Countries that went to War:-

Central Powers

1. Austria-Hungary

2. Germany

3. Turkey

4. Italy

Allies

1. Serbia

2. Russia because of alliance with Serbia

3. France because of alliance with Russia. German forces invaded neutral

4. Belgium to cut short their route to France.

5. Great Britain because of alliance with Belgium.

6-10 Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand, South Africa because of being Colonies of Great Britain.

11. Japan because of its alliance with Great Britain.

12 Portugal (9th March 1916)

13. Romania (April 1916)

14. America (6th April, 1917)

During or after February, 1915 Bro. Winston Churchill, critical of the Dardenelles campaign, resigned his post as First Lord of the Admiralty. He rejoined the army as a battalion commander. Winston Churchill served in Belgium as lieutenant colonel of the Royal Scots Fusiliers. IN December 1916 Lloyd George became Prime Minister of the war time coalition in England. There was considerable disagreement among the members of the Cabinet, especially between Lloyd George and his war secretary, Sir Douglas Haig. Lloyd George suspected Haig of squandering life needlessly and was suspicious of his demands for more men and freedom of action in the field. Bro Sir Earl Douglas Haig British Field Marshal during World War I was initiated in Elgin Lodge No. 91, Leven, Scotland.

6th April, 1917 The United States of America declared war on Germany in response to the sinking, by German U boats, of US ships.? The war on behalf of America was led by American General Bro. John Joseph Pershing Lincoln Lodge No. 19, Lincoln Nebraska. 2nd American Army General was Douglas MacArthur who became a 5 star American General, having served in both world wars. He was Made a Mason "at sight" in the Philippines and became 32 deg in Manilla and life member of the Nile Shrine Temple, Seattle, Washington. Poinsett, Joel R. USA Secretary of War, Master: Solomon's Lodge No. 1, Charleston, introduced Freemasonry into Mexico.

In November German armies were still in French and Belgian territory, Berlin remained 450 miles from the nearest front, and the German armies retired from the field of battle in good order. Britain and France were too war-weary to contemplate an invasion of Germany with its unknown consequences. No Allied army had penetrated the western German frontier, Western Front, and on the Eastern Front, Germany had already won the war against Russia, concluded with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. In the West, Germany had come close to winning the war with the Spring Offensive. – Quote of Adolph Hitler “when out of the cool nights the Allied soldiers already seemed to hear the dull rumble of the advancing storm units of the German army, and with eyes fixed in fear and trepidation awaited the approaching judgment, suddenly a flaming red light arose in Germany, casting its glow into the last shell-hole of the enemy front: at the very moment when the German divisions were receiving their last instructions for the great attack, the general strike broke out in Germany in all of its armaments factories thus depriving the German army of crucial arms and ammunitions. It strengthened the enemy belief in victory and relieved the paralyzing despair of the Allied front-in the time that followed, thousands of German soldiers had to pay for this with their blood. The instigators of this vilest of all scoundrelly tricks were the aspirants to the highest state positions of revolutionary Germany.”-

9th November, 1918 Germany surrendered and German King Kaiser Wilhelm II was abdicated. On the Abdication of King Kaiser Wilhelm II, Adolph Hitler in his famous biography “MEIN KAMPF” says :-

“In November the general tension increased. - And then one day, suddenly and unexpectedly, the calamity descended. Sailors arrived in trucks and proclaimed the revolution; a few Jewish youths were the 'leaders' in this struggle for the 'freedom, beauty, and dignity' of our national existence. None of them had been at the front.”

The craft masonry is nursery of Masonry. Actual masonry begins with higher degrees. When I was reading Mein Kampf I could immediately realize the connection of these three words to Freemasonry which became the War cry of ‘Revolutionaries’ which ended the World War One.

The Imperial Naval Command in Kiel under Admiral Franz von Hipper, planned to dispatch the fleet for a Final battle against the British Navy in the English Channel. The sailors revolt started on the Schillig Roads off Wilhelmshaven, where the German fleet had anchored in expectation of a planned battle. During the night from 29 to 30 October 1918 some crews refused to obey orders. On board of three ships from the Third Navy Squadron sailors refused to lift anchor. On board of the battle ships from the First Navy Squadron SMS "Thüringen“ and "Helgoland" outright mutiny and sabotage occurred. As of 4 November delegations of the sailors scattered out to all larger cities in the country with the cry of 'freedom, beauty, and dignity'. Already by 7 November the revolution had seized all larger coastal cities as well as Hanover, Brunswick, Frankfurt and Munich. In Munich a Workers' and Soldiers' Council forced the last King of Bavaria, Ludwig III, to abdicate. And for all practical purposes War was over.

In November 1919, the newly elected Weimar National Assembly initiated a Untersuchungsausschuß für Schuldfragen to investigate the causes of Germany's defeat. On November 18th, German Field Marshal Von Hindenburg testified in front of this parliamentary commission, and cited a December 17, 1918 Neue Zürcher Zeitung article that summarized two earlier articles in the Daily Mail by British General Frederick Barton Maurice with the phrase that the German army had been 'dagger-stabbed from behind by the civilian populace'.

General Erich Friedrich Wilhelm Ludendorff was Chief of German Army staff during World War 1. After the war he wrote a book blaming Freemasonry for Germany’s defeat. To quote a few lines :-

"Masonry brings its members into conscious subjection to the Jews... it trains them to become venal Jews.. German Masonry is a branch of organized international Masonry the headquarters of which are in New York ...There also is the seat of Jewish world Power.... Freemasons wore aprons to conceal the fact that, being Jews, they had been circumcised."

In the book, General Ludendorff blamed Freemasons for bringing America into the World War I, helped by the Jesuits, B'nai B'rith and the Grand Lodge of New York! This, he stated, was done to destroy Austria Hungary, a Catholic world power. Had it not been for Freemasonry, Germany would have won the war -- Kaiser Wilhelm and Czar Nicholas lost their thrones because they were not Freemasons -- "Annihilation of Freemasonry Through Revelation of its Secrets!"

Freemasons still honor those who laid down their lives for New World Order or a World dominated by Jews

List of decesed members of Inner circle in Temple church London. These photos were taken by Author.

The list contains names of several hundred of those who sacrificed for the "cause".

Russian Revolution

Lies being taught;

Russian revolution was spontaneous uprising of Russian peasantry to overthrow czarist regime

 

Now the truth;

In my news letter of November 2008, I had mentioned about role of Freemasons to establish socialism and end monarchy which they achieved due to WW 1. Following is the account of; The Russian Revolution;-

The Russian revolution was financed by Jacob Schiff, a 33rd degree mason (http://www.bible believers.org. au/33rd.htm, chairman of the banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and a minion of the Rothschilds, who took care of the contacts between the "revolutionary movement in Russia" and B'nai B'rith. (Gerald B. Winrod, "Adam Weishaupt - A Human Devil", p. 47.) (http://www.redicecreations.com/ specialreports/2005/08aug/sovietrisefall.html). On March 27, 1917, Trotsky a prominent freemason led 300 well-trained Jewish Communists aboard the Norwegian steamer "Kristianiafjord" for a journey to Sweden, and then via railroad, went through Sweden and Finland to St. Petersburg in Russia. Trotsky's group included revolutionaries, PR men, etc. Their purpose was to finish the Russian revolution and establish a Marxist government under the leadership of Lenin, Stalin, and Trotsky. Schiff gave this group $20 million in gold. In 1917, Rothschild,Natan Meyer (Anglo-German financier. Emulation Lodge No. 21.) directed Lenin to replace Kerensky. Lenin, joined by Trotsky and 300 Jews from New York, depose Kerensky. On April 22, 1918 Czar Nicholas II and the Royal Family leave Tobolsk for Moscow. On April 30, 1918, the Bolsheviks took the Romanovs off the train in Ekaterinburg. From May 1 through July 17th, the Romanovs lived in the Ipatiev house, Ekaterinburg. The group knew that White Russian army was trying to rescue the Romanovs from the Red Army, and had to act fast. Once the peasants realized they were swindled, they would re-install the Romanovs. Yankel Sverdlov (né Solomon) sent the order to Yurovsky to kill the Royal Family.

IPATIEV HOUSE, EKATERINBURG, URAL MOUNTAINS, RUSSIA, Night of July 16/17 1918, the last Emperor of Russian Royal family was awakened around 2:00 am, told to dress, and led down into a half-basement room at the back of the Ipatiev house; Present with Tsar Nicholas II, was his wife Alexandra, their 14 year son Tsarevich Alexis, four daughters Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria, the Tsar's personal physician Eugene Botkin, his wife's maid Anna Demidova, family's chef, Ivan Kharitonov, and footman, Alexei Trupp. A firing squad consisting Yurovsky, Medvedev, Nikulin, Yermakov, Vaganov, all Jewish Cheka assassins had been assembled and were waiting in an adjoining room, When the empress and the heir were seated, the executioners filed into the room. Yurovsky announced to them that they had been condemned to death by the Ural Soviet of Workers' Deputies. A stunned Nicholas asked, "What? What?" and turned toward his family. Yurovsky repeated the order. The Tsar said, "You know not what you do," paraphrasing Jesus's words on the cross. The executioners then drew revolvers and the shooting began. Nicholas was the first to die; Yurovsky shot him multiple times in the head and chest. Rest were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house, Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria survived the first hail of bullets; the sisters were wearing over 1.3 kilograms of diamonds and precious gems sewn into their clothing, which provided some initial protection from the bullets. After the shooting ended, Yurovsky and two guards stayed and undressed the girls, so as to check for hidden jewels. Jewels hidden in their corsets had deflected bullets, and they were still alive. Yurovsky let the guards take 'Liberties' with the girls. The girls were later stabbed with bayonets and then shot at close range in the head.

The Romanovs during happier days

Writing on the Wall: The Heine Quotation;- Lines adapted from the Jewish poet Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) were found written on the wall, in the basement of the Ipatiev House, where the Romanovs were shot and bayoneted. It reads: "Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht/Von seinen Knechten umgebracht," "Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves."

Belshazzar — the Gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw "the writing on the wall" foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) - was killed as punishment for his offenses against Israel's God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, has substituted "Belsatzar" for Heine's spelling "Belsazar," in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial/ethnic character of the murders: A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution. 

ASSASSINATION OF LAST EMPEROR OF RUSSIA WAS MASONIC/JEWISH CONSPIRACY

In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was Co-signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order. His research also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, ‘The Last Days of the Romanovs’ - originally published in 1920, and recently reissued by the Institute for Historical Review - is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of "White" leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's book remains the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia's imperial family.

Lenin and; Yakov Sverdlov, (Yankel-Aaron Solomon) who co-signed execution order were Freemasons. Lenin was a freemason of the 31st degree (Grand Inspecteur Inquisiteur Commandeur) and a member of the lodge Art et Travail in Switzerland and France. (Oleg Platonov, "Russia's Crown of Thorns: The Secret History of Freemasonry", Moscow, 2000, part II, p. 417). When Lenin visited the headquarters of Grand Orient on rue Cadet in Paris, he signed the visitors' book. (Viktor Kuznetsov, "The Secret of the October Coup", St. Petersburg, 2001, p. 42.) Lenin took part in the International Masonic Conference in Copenhagen in 1910. ("The Road to Socialism", Munich, 1930, p. 9.) The socialisation of Europe was on the agenda.

In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Freemasons played most critical role. Most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Freemasons. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary and - as chairman of the Central Executive Committee - head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Freemasons included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld). (According to Nikolai Svitkov's "About Freemasonry in Russia", published in Paris in 1932). Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik secret squad cheka that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jew.

The 62 members of the Central Committee which was later formed was composed of five Russians, one Ukrainian, six Latvians, two Germans, one Czech, two Armenians, three Georgians, one Karaim [Karaite] (a Jewish sect), and 41 Jews.” "The Extraordinary Commission [Cheka] of Moscow was composed of 36 members, including one German, one Pole, one Armenian, two Russians, eight Latvians, and 23 Jews."The Council of the People's Commissars [the Soviet .government] numbered two Armenians, three Russians, and 17 Jews."According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik state, including the above-mentioned, in 1918-1919 there were: 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Latvians, 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns, one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews." Effective governmental power, Wilton continued (on pages 136-138 of the same edition) is in the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party. In 1918, he reported, this body had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin, and three were of Russian ancestry. The nine Jews were: Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinoviev), Lurie (Larine), Uritsky, Volodarski, Rosenfeld (Kamenev), Smidovich, Sverdlov (Yankel), and Nakhamkes (Steklov). The three Russians were: Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko, and Lunacharsky. 

"The other Russian Socialist parties are similar in composition," Wilton went on. "Their Central Committees are made up as follows:"

Mensheviks (Social Democrats): Eleven members, all of whom are Jewish.

Communists of the People: Six members, of whom five are Jews and one is a Russian.

Social Revolutionaries (Right Wing): Fifteen members, of whom 13 are Jews and two are Russians (Kerenski, who may be of Jewish origin, and Tchaikovski).

Social Revolutionaries (Left Wing): Twelve members, of whom ten are Jews and two are Russians.

Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow: Five members, of whom four are Jews and one is a Russian.

Polish Communist Party: Twelve members, all of whom are Jews, including Sobelson (Radek), Krokhenal (Zagonski), and Schwartz (Goltz).

"These parties," commented Wilton, "in appearance opposed to the Bolsheviks, play the Bolsheviks' game on the sly, more or less, by preventing the Russians from pulling themselves together. Out of 61 individuals at the head of these parties, there are six Russians and 55 Jews. No matter what may be the name adopted, a revolutionary government will be Jewish."

[Although the Bolsheviks permitted these leftist political groups to operate for a time under close supervision and narrow limits, even these pitiful remnants of organized opposition were thoroughly eliminated by the end of the 1921 .]

Winston S Churchill Feb. 8, 1920 Illustrated Sunday Herald: "There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews." The term ‘atheistical’ is co incidental with ‘Masonic’. Churchill who joined freemasonry in 1905 had left it in 1911.

Brethren will easily recognize the Jewish National Symbol which is splashed on all Masonic Lodges/temples.